Consensus on complementary feeding from the Latin American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition: COCO 2023.

Complementary feeding (CF) is defined as the feeding of infants that complements breastfeeding, or alternatively, feeding with a breast milk substitute, and is a process that is more than simply a guide as to what and how to introduce foods. The information provided by healthcare professionals must be up-to-date and evidence-based. Most of the recommendations that appear in the different international guidelines and position papers are widely applicable, but some must be regionalized or adapted to fit the conditions and reality of each geographic zone. The Nutrition Working Group of the Latin American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (LASPGHAN) summoned a group of experts from each of the society's member countries, to develop a consensus on CF, incorporating, whenever possible, local information adapted to the reality of the region. The aim of the present document is to show the results of that endeavor. Utilizing the Delphi method, a total of 34 statements on relevant aspects of CF were evaluated, discussed, and voted upon.

E-1500: Survey on feeding practices in the first 1,500 days of life, recommended by healthcare professionals in Latin America.

INTRODUCTION: Health-disease processes are established and programmed in the first 1500 days of life, a period in which nutrition and the microbiota play a fundamental role. Feeding practices vary, according to regional sociocultural characteristics. The Early Nutrition Group of the Latin American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (LASPGHAN) established the goal of identifying the main feeding practices in the first 1500 days that were recommended by health professionals in Latin America. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey was conducted on the aspects of maternal-infant and young child nutrition during the first 1500 days of life. An open invitation was extended to Latin American healthcare professionals to anonymously answer the online survey. RESULTS: A total of 1284 surveys from participants in 18 Latin American countries were analyzed. The mean age of the participants was 37.14 ±â€¯11.1 years, 75.7% were women, 64.7% were physicians, and the rest were nutritionists/nutriologists. A total of 71.4% were familiar with the concept of the first 1000 days of life, 95% answered that exclusive breastfeeding should be carried out up to 6 months of age, and 34.3% responded that complementary feeding should be begun between 4 and 6 months of age. There was scant knowledge regarding nutrition in the pregnant woman. Adherence to traditional complementary feeding practices was evident. CONCLUSIONS: In a group of Latin American healthcare professionals, knowledge about nutrition in the first 1000-1500 days of life of an individual is still incomplete and insufficient, showing the need for continued training of healthcare professionals, with respect to those themes.

Consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of cow's milk protein allergy of the Latin American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition.

Cow's milk protein allergy (CMPA) is the most frequent cause of food allergy in the first months of life. Despite the fact that there are different guidelines and recommendations on the management of children with CMPA, there continues to be great variability in diagnostic and therapeutic criteria in Latin America. The Food Allergy Working Group of the Latin American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition summoned a group of Latin American experts to reach a consensus and formulate a document to unify diagnostic and therapeutic criteria for CMPA. Three teams were formed, each with a coordinator, and the members of each team developed a series of statements for their corresponding module: a) clinical manifestations and diagnosis; b) diagnostic tools, and c) treatment. A search of the medical literature was carried out to support the information presented in each module and 28 statements were then selected. The statements were discussed, after which they were evaluated by all the experts, utilizing the Delphi method. Their opinions on statement agreement or disagreement were anonymously issued. The final statements selected were those with above 75% agreement and their corresponding recommendations were formulated, resulting in the document presented herein.

[Exercise as a therapeutic strategy in epilepsy: a literature review]. / El ejercicio como estrategia terapéutica en la epilepsia: revisión bibliográfica.

INTRODUCTION: Epilepsy is a common neurologic disease with emotional and physical consequences. Thirty percent of patients have drug-resistant epilepsy, therefore adjuvant non-pharmacological therapies, such as physical activity, have been proposed. AIM: This study reviews the literature about physical activity in people with epilepsy, to evaluate the benefits, potential side effects, impact on comorbidities, the risk classification of sports, and the barriers to their practice. DEVELOPMENT: Multiple animal and human models evaluate the benefits of exercise in epilepsy, explained by modulation on neurotransmitters, hormones, and neurotrophic factors. Furthermore, exercise demonstrates positive impact on comorbidities such as obesity, cardiovascular disease, depression, and osteoporosis. Despite being a practice that has been shown to be safe, people with epilepsy are less physically active due to barriers that limit their practice. CONCLUSIONS: Physical activity is beneficial and safe for people with epilepsy. Literature suggests better control of seizures, psychosocial benefits, and improvements on the comorbidities. There is a low risk of injury associated. Exercise should be promoted after a careful clinical evaluation, considering seizure control in the last year, potential triggering factors and the sport chosen.

TITLE: El ejercicio como estrategia terapéutica en la epilepsia: revisión bibliográfica.Introducción. La epilepsia es una enfermedad neurológica común con consecuencias emocionales y físicas significativas. Hasta el 30% de los pacientes son refractarios a los fármacos antiepilépticos, por lo que se han planteado terapias no farmacológicas coadyuvantes, como la actividad física. Objetivo. Se realizó una búsqueda en la bibliografía sobre actividad física en personas con epilepsia, con el fin de evaluar los beneficios, potenciales efectos secundarios, el impacto en las comorbilidades, la clasificación de riesgo de cada deporte y las barreras existentes para su práctica. Desarrollo. Múltiples modelos en animales y en humanos evalúan los beneficios del ejercicio en la epilepsia, explicados por efectos en neurotransmisores, hormonas y factores neurotróficos; además, demuestran efectos positivos en comorbilidades como la obesidad, las enfermedades cardiovasculares, la depresión y la osteoporosis. A pesar de ser una práctica que ha mostrado ser segura, las personas con epilepsia son menos activas físicamente debido a barreras que limitan su práctica. Conclusiones. La actividad física es beneficiosa y segura para las personas con epilepsia. La bibliografía sugiere un mejor control de las crisis epilépticas, además de beneficios psicosociales y sobre las comorbilidades. Hay un bajo riesgo de lesiones asociadas con esta práctica. El ejercicio debería promoverse después de una evaluación clínica cuidadosa, considerando el control de crisis en el último año, posibles factores precipitantes y el tipo de deporte que se va a practicar.

[Patients' perceptions of and attitudes towards epilepsy surgery: mistaken concepts in Colombia]. / Percepciones y actitudes de los pacientes frente a la cirugia de la epilepsia: conceptos equivocados en Colombia.

INTRODUCTION: Selected patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy benefit from epilepsy surgery, however significant delays remain. The aim of this study was to assess knowledge and attitudes toward epilepsy surgery among patients with epilepsy and identify barriers that might delay the treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 10-minute questionnaire was administered to patients with epilepsy in Colombia. Survey assessed the following: knowledge of surgical options, perceptions about the risks of surgery vs. ongoing seizures, disease disability, treatment goals, and demographic and socioeconomic variables. RESULTS: We recruited 88 patients with focal epilepsy. More than half of patients (56%) were not aware that surgery might be an option. Apprehension about epilepsy surgery was evident, 60% of patients perceived epilepsy surgery to be very or moderately dangerous. A large proportion of patients believe death (41%), stroke (47%), vision loss (56%), personality change (56%), paralysis (62%), difficulties in speaking (69%), and memory loss (60%) were frequent side effects. The majority of patients (62%) consider the surgical procedure as the last option of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: There is a negative attitude toward epilepsy surgery based on the patients' misperceptions of suffering neurological deficits during the surgery, reflecting lack of knowledge toward this type of treatment. These perceptions can contribute to delays in surgical care.

TITLE: Percepciones y actitudes de los pacientes frente a la cirugia de la epilepsia: conceptos equivocados en Colombia.Introduccion. Los pacientes con epilepsia focal farmacorresistente se podrian beneficiar de la cirugia de la epilepsia; sin embargo, existen demoras en la realizacion del procedimiento. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el conocimiento y las actitudes de los pacientes hacia la cirugia de epilepsia e identificar barreras que pudieran retrasar el tratamiento. Pacientes y metodos. Se aplico un cuestionario de 10 minutos a pacientes con epilepsia en Colombia. La encuesta evaluo el conocimiento de la opcion quirurgica, las percepciones sobre el riesgo de la cirugia frente al riesgo de crisis no controladas, la discapacidad producida por la enfermedad, las metas del tratamiento y las variables demograficas y socioeconomicas. Resultados. Se seleccionaron 88 pacientes con epilepsia focal. El 56% de los pacientes no sabia que la cirugia podria ser una opcion terapeutica. El 60% considero que la cirugia de la epilepsia es muy o moderadamente peligrosa. Una gran proporcion pensaba que la muerte (41%), el ictus (47%), la perdida visual (56%), los cambios en la personalidad (56%), la paralisis (61%), las dificultades para hablar (69%) y la perdida de la memoria (60%) eran efectos secundarios comunes. La mayoria (62%) consideraba el procedimiento como la ultima opcion de tratamiento. Conclusiones. Existe una actitud negativa por parte de los pacientes frente a la cirugia de la epilepsia fundamentada en la sobreestimacion del riesgo de adquirir deficits neurologicos secundarios al procedimiento, lo que refleja la falta de conocimiento hacia este tratamiento. Estas percepciones erroneas pueden contribuir a demoras en la atencion quirurgica.

Enfermería: ¿Ciencia Normal o Ciencia Revolucionaria? / Nursing: Normal Research or Revolutionary Research? / Enfermagem: Ciência Normal ou Ciência Revolucionária?

Introducción: En Colombia la educación doctoral de enfermería es un progreso relativamente reciente. Tras una década de formación, aspectos como el aporte de nuevo conocimiento, el avance en los diseños - metodologías de investigación, y la cantidad de doctores formados, son subestimadas o inexistentes. Este contexto lleva a indagar al respecto los retos y limitantes de la generación de nuevo conocimiento de enfermería. Objetivos: Discutir el progreso de los doctorados de enfermería en Colombia, como descriptor específico del desarrollo disciplinar y científico del conocimiento enfermero, sustentado a partir de los constructos teóricos planteados en la obra de Thomas Kuhn, y de la trans-disciplinariedad. Metodología: Estudio descriptivo, narrativo basado en una revisión documental de la literatura acerca del perfeccionamiento del conocimiento enfermero llevado a cabo en Colombia. Resultados y Conclusiones: La tasa de titulación de doctores en enfermería no sufre incrementos desde 2011; solamente un 6.4% de los trabajos de tesis doctoral desarrollado, tienen un alcance de tipo concluyente; aunque se evidencia una correlación positiva entre las teorías de enfermería y los problemas de estudio desarrollados por los doctores en enfermería, no es claro el abordaje particular que se hace de los metaparadigmas, y las visiones de enfermería dentro del diseño de cada estudio. Se propone impulsar el trabajo colaborativo (trans-disciplinariedad), así como estimular el desarrollo de programas acordes con las necesidades sentidas de la sociedad colombiana. Se evidencia la no existencia de congruencia entre los postulados de Kuhn y el desarrollo epistemológico de la enfermería actual.

Introduction: In Colombia, the nursing doctoral education is a relatively recent process. After a decade of formation, aspects such as the new knowledge input, the evolution of designs and methodologies of research, and the number of doctoral staff formed are still underestimated. Within this context, it is important to inquire on the challenges and barriers related to generation of new nursing knowledge. Objectives: considering the theoretical constructs derived from Thomas Kuhn's works to discuss the progress of nursing doctorates in Colombia as an indicator of the discipline development. Methodology: This is a descriptive and narrative study from a literature review on the process of nursing knowledge improvement in the Colombian context. Results and Conclusions: The nursing doctorate graduation rate has not increased since 2011; only 6.4% of the doctoral dissertations have a concluding reach; although a positive correlation between the nursing theories and the problems studied by the doctorates was evidenced, the approaches to the meta-paradigms and the nursing visions within each study are not clear. A lack of congruency between Khun's postulates and the epistemological development of present-day nursing in Colombia was also evidenced. Collaborative trans-disciplinary initiatives are encouraged in order to stimulate the development of research programs which address the needs of the Colombian society.

Introdução: Na Colômbia a educação doutoral de enfermagem é um progresso relativamente recente. Depois uma década de formação, aspectos como o aporte de novo conhecimento, o avanço nos desenhos-metodologias de pesquisa, e a quantidade de doutores formados, são subestimadas ou inexistentes. Este contexto leva a procurar respeito aos desafios e limitantes da geração de novo conhecimento de enfermagem. Objetivos: Discutir o progresso dos doutorandos de enfermagem na Colômbia, como descritor específico do desenvolvimento disciplinar e científico do conhecimento enfermeiro, sustentado a partir dos constructos teóricos abordados na obra de Thomas Kuhn, e da transdisciplinaridade. Metodologia: Estudo descritivo, narrativo baseado em uma revisão documentária da literatura acerca do aperfeiçoamento do conhecimento enfermeiro efetuado na Colômbia. Resultados e Conclusões: A taxa de titulação de doutores em enfermagem não sofre incrementos desde 2011; somente um 6.4% dos trabalhos de tese doutoral desenvolvido, têm um alcanço de tipo concluinte; ainda que se evidencia uma correlação positiva entre as teorias de enfermagem e os problemas de estudo desenvolvidos pelos doutores em enfermagem, não é clara a abordagem particular que se faz dos metaparadigmas, e as visões de enfermagem dentro do desenho de cada estudo. Propõe-se impulsionar o trabalho colaborativo (transdisciplinaridade), assim como estimular o desenvolvimento de programas acordes com as necessidades sentidas da sociedade colombiana. Evidencia-se a não existência de congruência entre os postulados de Kuhn e o desenvolvimento epistemológico da enfermagem atual.

[Barriers impeding access to epilepsy surgery: a review of the literature]. / Barreras de acceso a la cirugia de la epilepsia: revision de la bibliografia.

Drug-resistant epilepsy, a chronic condition with long-term consequences can be treated with surgery. The efficacy and safety of surgery for temporal lobe epilepsy have been established through a large number of retrospective and prospective cohort studies and two randomized controlled clinical trials. Despite the excellent outcomes reported after surgery, the literature suggests that this procedure is an underutilized treatment. While evidence is lacking as to why epilepsy surgery is underused, cited reasons include: failure of primary care physicians and neurologists to provide information and identify patients who could be referred for surgery; different levels of technology at various centers, resulting in different candidate selection strategies; the belief that epilepsy surgery is a risky procedure and that it should be only viewed as the last option; patient preference to avoid surgery; parents wanting to wait until their child is old enough to participate in the decision-making process regarding surgery; unwillingness of insurers to cover the expenses associated with presurgical evaluations or lack of insurance; racial and social disparities, among others. In this paper we review the available epidemiological data about lack of utilization of epilepsy surgery.

TITLE: Barreras de acceso a la cirugia de la epilepsia: revision de la bibliografia.La epilepsia farmacorresistente es una condicion cronica con consecuencias a largo plazo que puede ser tratada quirurgicamente. La eficacia y la seguridad de la cirugia de la epilepsia del lobulo temporal se han establecido a traves de un gran numero de estudios de cohorte retrospectivos y prospectivos y dos ensayos clinicos controlados aleatorizados. A pesar de los excelentes resultados comunicados con la cirugia, la bibliografia sugiere que este procedimiento es un tratamiento subutilizado. Aunque no existe evidencia de esto, entre algunos de los motivos descritos se apuntan el fallo de los medicos de atencion primaria y los neurologos en proveer informacion, identificar y remitir a los pacientes a un centro de cirugia; los diferentes niveles de tecnologia en los centros, lo que provoca distintas estrategias de seleccion de los candidatos; la creencia de que la cirugia de la epilepsia es un procedimiento arriesgado que deberia contemplarse solo como ultima opcion; la preferencia del paciente por evitar la cirugia; el deseo de los padres de esperar hasta que sus hijos sean lo suficientemente mayores para participar en el proceso de toma de decisiones; el hecho de que las aseguradoras no cubran los gastos asociados con las evaluaciones prequirurgicas o la carencia de un seguro medico, y la desigualdad racial y social, entre otros. En este articulo se revisan los datos epidemiologicos disponibles en relacion con la falta de acceso a la cirugia de la epilepsia.

[Diagnosis and treatment of non-triggered single epileptic seizures]. / Diagnostico y tratamiento de la crisis epileptica unica no provocada.

Epileptic seizures are one of the main reasons for neurological visits in an emergency department. Convulsions represent a traumatic event for the patient and the family, with significant medical and social consequences. Due to their prevalence and impact, the initial management is of vital importance. Although following the first epileptic seizure, early recurrence diminishes after establishing treatment with antiepileptic drugs, the forecast for developing epilepsy and long-term outcomes are not altered by any early intervention. Detailed questioning based on the symptoms of the convulsions, the patient's medical history and a full electroencephalogram and neuroimaging study make it possible to define the risk of recurrence of the seizure and the possible diagnosis of epilepsy. Epileptic abnormalities, the presence of old or new potentially epileptogenic brain lesions, as well as nocturnal seizures, increase the risk of recurrence. Physicians must assess each patient on an individual basis to determine the most suitable treatment, and explain the risk of not being treated versus the risk that exists if treatment with antiepileptic drugs is established.

TITLE: Diagnostico y tratamiento de la crisis epileptica unica no provocada.Las crisis epilepticas son una de las principales causas de consulta neurologica en el servicio de urgencias. Un episodio convulsivo representa un evento traumatico para el paciente y la familia, con consecuencias medicas y sociales significativas. Por su prevalencia e impacto, el abordaje inicial es de vital importancia. Si bien despues de una primera crisis epileptica la recurrencia temprana disminuye con el inicio de farmacos antiepilepticos, el pronostico para el desarrollo de epilepsia y los desenlaces a largo plazo no se alteran por ninguna intervencion temprana. El interrogatorio detallado basado en la semiologia del episodio, los antecedentes del paciente y un estudio completo con electroencefalograma y neuroimagen permiten definir el riesgo de recurrencia de la crisis y el posible diagnostico de epilepsia. Las anormalidades epilepticas, la presencia de lesiones cerebrales con potencial epileptogeno antiguas o nuevas, asi como las crisis nocturnas, incrementan el riesgo de recurrencia. Los medicos deben evaluar a cada paciente de manera individual para determinar un tratamiento idoneo, explicando el riesgo de no tratar frente al riesgo existente con el inicio de farmacos antiepilepticos.